---

Forex multi-account manager Z-X-N
Accepts global forex account operation, investment, and trading
Assists family office investment and autonomous management

---

Licensed forex brokers in Japan cannot list "betting against each other" as a regular business model like in other jurisdictions.

---

The Financial Services Agency (FSA), through the "Guidelines for Forex Margin Trading" and the "Investment Services Law," has enshrined "customer losses cannot be included in company profits" as a regulatory red line. Any intention to keep orders in internal bookkeeping must first prove: 1. The hedging size is less than 10% of the total notional principal traded in the current month; 2. The hedging window cannot exceed 180 seconds; 3. The net exposure after hedging must still be closed through the Tokyo Financial Exchange (TFX) or the Nikkei index liquidity pool before 16:30 on the same day. Violation of any of these provisions can result in the FSA immediately revoke a Type 1 financial instruments trading license and impose a fine of up to 500 million yen. Such high costs for violations have led leading platforms like Rakuten Securities, SBI FXTRADE, DMM FX, and Okasan Online to default to sending over 90% of retail traffic directly to interbank ECNs. They only use instant internal matching for small orders (less than one lot), and the matched price must deviate from the best bid/ask price simultaneously quoted by Mitsubishi UFJ, Mizuho, ​​and Sumitomo Mitsui by no more than 0.01 yen; otherwise, the system automatically returns the order to an external channel.
To optimize order placement, Japanese brokers generally employ a "dual-channel + dual-audit" architecture. After an order enters the front-end gateway, the Smart Order Router compares the liquidity pool depths in Tokyo, New York, and London within 50 microseconds. If the available quantity in any pool is less than 80% of the client's order amount, the order is automatically split and simultaneously uploaded to the FSA's real-time monitoring system. After execution, the back-end clearing engine immediately generates an immutable hash value, which, along with a transaction snapshot, is submitted to the external audit firm (PwC or Deloitte) and the FSA regional office, achieving T+0 double traceability. The company's revenue can only come from the listed spread and fixed commission—for example, on USD/JPY, mainstream platforms charge a spread of 0.09 pips + a commission of 50 yen per 100,000 notional principal, totaling approximately $1.40, far lower than the 1.8–2.0 pips spread income commonly seen by Hong Kong market makers, but completely eliminating the profit path of "profiting from client losses."
The hard constraint of leverage limits further compresses the broker's room for maneuver. The FSA locks in margin ratios for major currency pairs at 25x, cross-currency pairs at 20x, and precious metals at 10x, far lower than the 200x allowed in Hong Kong. Lower leverage means a lower probability of client liquidation. Platforms seeking to profit through "slippage hunting" would need to manipulate the market more frequently and for longer periods. Real-time transaction snapshots ensure that any abnormal slippage exceeding 0.1 pips is flagged by the FSA algorithm within 30 minutes. In the past five years, only two local small-to-medium-sized brokerages have been ordered to cease operations due to "systemic positive slippage," and the total fines and confiscations across the industry have amounted to less than 700 million yen, demonstrating the clarity of the red lines and the rigidity of enforcement.
Compared to offshore "black markets," Japanese licensed institutions exhibit overwhelming differences in fund segregation, liquidity access, and information disclosure. Client funds must be held in a "trust preservation account" with the Japan Bankers Association, and reconciled with the company's own funds twice daily at 15:00 and 23:00. A difference exceeding 0.1% triggers automatic freezing. Liquidity providers must be local city banks or FSA-certified international Tier 1 market makers with a credit rating no lower than A+. The official website must disclose a quarterly order execution quality report, including 27 indicators such as average execution speed, slippage distribution, and completion rate. If any indicator falls below the industry average by more than 10%, a risk warning email must be sent to clients, and rectification must be completed within a specified period. This stringent layer of regulations makes Japanese forex platforms one of the very few globally that standardizes "order placement" and makes "betting" an exception, demonstrating compliance.

Hong Kong retail forex clients with orders under US$10,000 will have their orders internally matched to exceed US$100,000, or professional clients will have their orders placed on the market.

---

Hong Kong licensed forex brokers do not employ a simple binary approach of "betting" or "placing orders" in two-way trading. Instead, they dynamically combine three mechanisms—market maker (DD), straight-through processing (STP), and electronic communication network (ECN)—within a compliant framework, based on client attributes, order size, regulatory costs, and their own liquidity management objectives. They must continuously demonstrate to the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) that conflicts have been fully disclosed, risks have been effectively isolated, and clients have been treated fairly.
The SFC's Type 3 license does not prohibit brokers from acting as counterparties to clients, but it requires that any "internalized" arrangements be clearly stated in the business plan and accompanied by three lines of defense: dual review of "quote-risk control," transaction-by-transaction record keeping, and independent auditing. This ensures that key parameters such as spreads, slippage, and rejection rates cannot be manipulated unilaterally. If an order is outsourced, it must be proven that the downstream liquidity provider is subject to equivalent or higher regulatory standards, and that client funds remain segregated after transparency.
In practice, fragmented orders from retail clients under $10,000, which do not meet the minimum threshold of $1 million standard lot in the interbank market, are typically matched internally by the brokerage. The company profits solely from the spread, with profits and losses naturally offsetting those of the client. When a single notional principal exceeds $100,000 or the client is classified as a professional investor, the system automatically switches to the STP/ECN channel, outsourcing the order to Tier-1 liquidity pools such as Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and Citadel. The brokerage only charges a commission of $10–30 per million dollars and no longer bears market risk.
To balance execution efficiency and compliance security, most Hong Kong-funded platforms adopt a "switchable hybrid" architecture: After an order enters the matching engine, the algorithm first evaluates 12 parameters, including size, product type, client's historical profit and loss, and market depth. If the client's strategy is predicted to have sustained profitability or the order's notional principal exceeds the internal exposure limit, it is immediately transferred to an external platform; otherwise, it remains in the internal bookkeeping system, simultaneously triggering the hedging module to establish back-to-back positions in offshore NDFs, CME futures, or prime brokers, ensuring that the company's net exposure does not exceed 5% of the client's notional principal.
The entire process is subject to both on-site inspections by the SFC and annual external audits. Client funds must be held in a Hong Kong licensed bank trust account, reconciled daily with the company's own funds, and any fund transfer exceeding 1% must be reported to the regulatory authorities within 24 hours.
In stark contrast are offshore "black market" platforms: these are typically registered in small island nations, have no local capital requirements, do not need to segregate client funds, and can arbitrarily manipulate slippage, amplify spreads, and even freeze profit accounts through backend plugins; their essence is gambling contracts. In contrast, licensed Hong Kong platforms, even when internalizing orders, must ensure that the quotes seen by clients do not differ from the best bid/ask prices on Reuters and Bloomberg by no more than 0.1 points, and all transaction records are stored in an immutable format for seven years, readily accessible to the SFC and the Hong Kong Police Force's Commercial Crime Bureau.

MAM and PAMM simplify "aggregated trading on behalf of clients" to percentage-based allocation, which does indeed circumvent the typical Ponzi scheme risk of misappropriation of funds in form. However, this also shifts the conflict to four levels: regulatory adaptation, technological capacity, market perception, and incentive compatibility. With these layers of friction, their penetration rate remains locked on the periphery of the retail forex ecosystem, making it difficult to enter the mainstream.

---

On the regulatory side, the model inherently carries a "license mismatch" gene. The UK's FCA treats percentage-based allocations as "portfolio management" under MiFID, requiring individuals to obtain authorization from an investment manager and hold at least £75,000 in personal capital and professional liability insurance. The US CFTC categorizes pooled accounts as "product pools," requiring traders to register as CTAs and submit audited quarterly pool reports to the NFA. Any performance claims without the statutory warning that "past performance is not indicative of future results" constitute a federal criminal violation. For most grassroots traders with "strong strategy signals but weak compliance budgets," the four fixed costs of capital, audit fees, professional liability insurance, and legal compliance personnel are enough to offset the appeal of a 20% performance fee. Consequently, many small teams are forced to operate in offshore regulatory loopholes, using exemption clauses or white-label technology to continue attracting clients, which in turn increases the platform's compliance liability. Several leading brokerages piloted the PAMM module between 2016 and 2018, but ultimately withdrew due to high customer complaint rates and regulatory communication costs—a clear example that "license barriers outweigh commercial benefits."
The inherent limitations of the technical architecture become apparent. Mainstream MetaBridge copy trading engines can only serially write to approximately 100 sub-accounts under a single master account. When signal concurrency exceeds 50 lots/millisecond, the server must poll in descending order of account size, naturally resulting in a price slippage of 30-200 milliseconds. For EURUSD with an average fluctuation of 0.3 points/second, this means that the probability of a sub-account's execution price differing from the master account's by 0.8-1.2 points exceeds 25%, creating a systemic deviation of "master profit, sub-account loss." While PAMM's percentage consolidation model can eliminate lot fragmentation, it introduces the collaborative risk of "large-scale redemptions—forced liquidation": if 30% of the notional funds suddenly withdraw at 22:00 on Friday, the leverage of the remaining positions instantly increases by 43%, and a gap at the weekend can trigger a collective forced liquidation of sub-accounts. These technical pitfalls cannot be solved simply by upgrading bandwidth; rather, they stem from the inherent coupling between the copy trading logic and the fund pool structure, causing platforms to repeatedly weigh user experience against risk control, ultimately choosing to scale back.
The gap in market trust is more persistent. The retail forex market inherently lacks unified performance verification standards. Traders can easily select three months of profits, leverage them with small accounts, and then smooth out the maximum drawdown data using charting software. Even with third-party verification via MyFXBook, the true performance curve can be hidden through "account reopening" and "selective liquidation." Potential investors often see "sweet returns" of 10%+ monthly returns and drawdowns of less than 5% on social media, only to face mean reversion after actually following their trades, with profits in the first month followed by a 50% loss in the second. Due to the concentrated liquidation of several "star PAMM" schemes between 2012 and 2015, the industry has developed a stereotype of "PAMM equals high-risk scam" on search engines. Even with legitimate platforms investing in educational marketing, it's difficult to reverse this negative association, leading to a sharp increase in customer acquisition costs.
The incentive structure further amplifies moral hazard. The mainstream profit-sharing model employs a "high-water mark 20%-30%" clause, where traders only take a cut of profits and bear no obligation to cover losses. When the net asset value (NAV) falls below the 0.9 high-water mark, the manager rationally chooses to double leverage to bet on a recovery, as all downside losses are borne by investors, while upside gains can be withdrawn immediately. This asymmetric option value amplifies as the NAV falls, causing some accounts to maintain a 1:200 leverage ratio even after a 40% drawdown, ultimately triggering forced liquidation. The lock-up period clause further deprives investors of the right to "vote with their feet": during the 3-6 month redemption window, even if the NAV curve continues to decline, funds remain locked in the pool, creating a negative gamma effect—the later the redemption, the lower the NAV, and the liquidity premium is completely reversed.
With the advent of the algorithmic era, copy trading scenarios have been further deconstructed by social trading and cloud-based Expert Advisors (EAs). Many forex brokerage platforms have broken down signal sources into quantifiable tags: Sharpe ratio, Karma, number of followers, and real-time slippage. Investors can adjust the weights weekly or even daily, and funds can be withdrawn at any time without waiting for quarterly redemption windows. AI-driven strategy marketplaces offer 24-hour backtesting, Monte Carlo stress testing, and blockchain hash performance documentation, offering far greater transparency than traditional PAMM monthly reports. For strategy developers, uploading algorithms allows them to charge subscription fees based on replication volume, without the unlimited liability of a 20% performance share. For platforms, the separation of signals and funds avoids the custody and compliance burdens of "collective accounts." Therefore, with the weakening of its sole advantage of "low-threshold fundraising," the technological bottlenecks, regulatory burdens, and incentive mismatches of MAM/PAMM become more prominent, making it difficult to escape marginalization. They are destined to circulate between offshore licenses and gray-market marketing, unable to enter the mainstream institutional and large-scale market.

In the cross-border over-the-counter leveraged market, do individual traders of MAMs and PAMMs possess the qualifications to "manage other people's funds"?

---

Firstly, it depends on how the regulator in the place of registration defines the legal status of "investment advisor" or "asset manager." Secondly, it is further refined by the risk control gates of the cooperating broker. The same percentage allocation technique will be embedded with completely different liability frameworks in different jurisdictions, thus forming a three-tiered ladder of "license type—capital threshold—continuous obligation." A single misstep may constitute unlicensed operation.
In the UK, aggregated trading directly falls under the "portfolio management" regulated activity of MiFIDII. Individuals must first pass the FCA's "qualification" test to obtain an Investment Manager license, and then meet different capital requirements depending on the scale of their business: if managing retail funds and holding client assets, they must meet the dual requirements of €50,000 in equity capital and €125,000 in professional liability insurance; if only providing signaling MAMs and not handling funds, they can apply for a £50,000 "small-scale exemption," but still need to join the Financial Ombudsman Scheme and purchase indemnity insurance. Before market access, the manager, broker, and client must sign an Investment Management Agreement (IMA) and a Limited Mandate Agreement The Limited Partner Account (LPOA) must include leverage limits, single-asset exposure, performance benchmarks, and dispute arbitration venues in its publicly disclosed documents. Any subsequent modifications must be uploaded to the FCA's RegData system within 24 hours; failure to do so constitutes a "material omission of information" and is subject to administrative penalties.
Under US law, commodity-based forex aggregation accounts are classified as "commodity pools" by the CFTC. Operators must register as Commodity Trading Advisors (CTAs) and simultaneously become NFA members. The application process requires submitting Form 7-R, a fingerprint card, a financial affidavit, and information on at least 10% of shareholders. If there are any securities or futures violations within the past five years, the NFA can initiate a "disqualification" process. Regarding ongoing obligations, CTAs must send audited pool reports to investors quarterly, disclosing 27 indicators including notional leverage, turnover rate, and expense ratio, and must include a legally mandated warning on the first page of promotional materials: "Past performance is not indicative of future results." Receiving payment without registration constitutes a federal criminal offense, punishable by up to five years imprisonment plus a fine of three times the illegal proceeds. Therefore, there is virtually no "grey area" for PAMMs in the United States.
In Australia, ASIC places responsibility under the "Responsible Manager" framework. Candidates must hold an accredited Bachelor of Finance or equivalent qualification and provide at least three years of OTC derivatives trading experience "towards similar clients." Background checks cover criminal records, bankruptcy history, and regulatory penalties; additional character verification is required if there has been punishment in other jurisdictions. Once approved, managers must complete 30 hours of Continuing Professional Development (CPD) annually and submit an annual compliance declaration to ASIC. Since the Product Intervention Order came into effect in 2021, the leverage for PAMMs targeting retail clients has been reduced to 1:30, but professional clients can still maintain 1:100. If a manager mistakenly classifies a retail account into a professional category, it triggers a "misclassification" civil penalty, with a maximum of AUD 935,000 for individuals and up to AUD 11 million for companies.
For EU gateways like Cyprus and Luxembourg, regulators utilize two pathways to convert aggregated accounts: the Unified Investment Scheme for Transferable Securities (UCITS) and Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs). Smaller pools with assets under management below €50 million can register as "Registered AIFs," receiving a license from the local securities regulatory commission, but must engage an independent custodian, administrative service provider, and auditor to form a tripartite balance of power. Those exceeding the threshold are upgraded to "Full-License AIFMs," requiring a minimum capital of €125,000 plus an additional 0.02% of assets under management. Managers without an "Investment Manager Passport" within the EU, even with a third-country CFA or CMT certificate, can only provide advice as "investment advisors" and are prohibited from directly handling funds or signing transaction confirmations; otherwise, they are operating without a license.
In the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC), the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) allows aggregated accounts to operate as "accredited investor funds," but with a minimum investment of US$50,000 and managers required to hold both a CISI investment operations certificate and a local compliance officer license. If the fund's leverage exceeds 2 times, a monthly stress test report must be submitted to the DFSA to ensure a 1.2 times asset coverage ratio even under a 200 basis point interest rate shock. Conversely, Vanuatu's VFSC's Class C license, while nominally recognizing "collective asset management," lacks on-site inspections, capital adequacy requirements, and mandatory audit clauses; annual reports only require a simplified balance sheet. This "three-no" framework attracts some brokers to create PAMM (Asset-Based Management Model) presentation pages at zero cost, then use low tax rates as bait to raise funds from Asia-Pacific clients. Once a margin call occurs or the broker absconds, investors have virtually no access to civil remedies locally.
This demonstrates that the same percentage allocation technique, embedded in a complete trusteeship chain of "high capital + continuous disclosure + independent custody" in strictly regulated areas, becomes a "naked channel" lacking any redress in more lenient offshore environments. A manager's "qualifications" are not merely a license, but a complete set of ongoing obligations and capital constraints. Before choosing a MAM/PAMM, investors should verify whether the manager holds an asset management license issued by the local securities regulatory commission, provides audited quarterly reports, and has professional liability insurance covering more than 1% of the managed assets—all three are indispensable to clearly distinguish between the allure of leverage and the safety of funds.

In the two-way trading field of forex investment, MAM (Multi-Account Management) and PAMM (Percentage Allocation Management) mechanisms are not restricted globally; in fact, these mechanisms have legal operation space in many countries and regions.

---

However, most of these countries and regions regulate their business processes by establishing strict and comprehensive regulatory rules to maximize the protection of investors' legitimate rights and interests. The specific regulatory status and operational norms of different mainstream countries and regions can be analyzed from multiple dimensions.
In the UK financial market, MAM and PAMM mechanisms are completely legal and compliant business models. Many forex brokers regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) include MAM/PAMM multi-account management services in their core business scope and strictly adhere to the FCA's regulatory framework. At the same time, the UK has set extremely high entry barriers for practitioners in this type of business. Whether it is an individual or a commercial company, to provide multi-account fund management services such as managed accounts, they must first obtain officially recognized investment manager professional qualifications. In addition, they must sign a series of standardized compliance documents, including a tripartite authorization agreement with clients and dealers. These documents clearly define the rights and responsibilities of all parties, preventing illegal operations from the source of the business and laying a solid foundation for compliant operations.
The Australian financial market also allows the operation of MAM and PAMM mechanisms. Numerous forex brokers in the local market offer such multi-account management services, and the corresponding regulatory work is entirely handled by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). It is worth noting that after ASIC completed its regulatory rule adjustments in 2021, brokers operating PAMM businesses in Australia strictly limited the leverage of major forex currency pairs for non-professional traders, setting it uniformly at 1:30. This standard is consistent with the relevant regulatory rules of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) of the European Union, reducing the trading risk for non-professional investors under the MAM/PAMM model through leverage restrictions.
As an important part of the EU financial market, Cyprus explicitly allows the legal operation of MAM and PAMM mechanisms in its domestic market. Forex brokers providing related multi-account management services in Cyprus are subject to full regulation by the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), and CySEC's regulatory standards for such businesses must strictly comply with the requirements of the EU's unified financial regulatory framework. This means that MAM/PAMM operations in Cyprus must comply with both the country's own financial regulatory rules and the EU's unified regulations on anti-money laundering and investor protection, thereby achieving regulatory synergy with the overall EU financial market.
Under Germany's financial regulatory system, the MAM and PAMM mechanisms are also legally qualified to operate. The German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), as one of the world's top financial regulatory bodies, conducts rigorous full-process supervision of related operations within Germany. Many large financial groups with multinational operating qualifications, after obtaining professional regulatory qualifications from BaFin, launch comprehensive fund management services in the local market, including MAM multi-account management terminals. BaFin imposes stringent regulatory standards on brokers' business practices, explicitly requiring them to ensure the fairness of transaction pricing and the transparency of operational processes. Through these regulatory measures, various investment risks inherent in the MAM/PAMM business model are effectively reduced.
The UAE financial center, with Dubai at its core, maintains a clear open attitude towards the MAM and PAMM mechanisms. Some local forex brokers, after obtaining regulatory qualifications from the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), can legally conduct related multi-account fund management business. As a crucial international financial hub in the Middle East, Dubai provides ample room for the development of compliant multi-account fund management models to further attract international financial investment. Simultaneously, it leverages the DFSA's professional regulatory system to control overall business risks, comprehensively regulating brokers' account operation procedures and fund management standards, thus promoting business development while maintaining market order.
Vanuatu, as a typical offshore financial center, also allows MAM/PAMM-related businesses to be conducted domestically. Therefore, many forex brokers choose to expand their business by leveraging licenses issued by local financial regulatory authorities. However, local regulation is generally weak, falling within the low-level regulatory sphere. For example, the Vanuatu Financial Services Commission (VFSC) issues Category C licenses that include MAM/PAMM business authority, but Vanuatu has been listed as a "non-cooperative tax haven" by the OECD. Its regulatory capabilities in combating money laundering and preventing financial crime are significantly insufficient, resulting in far weaker protection of investors' funds and legal rights compared to countries with stricter regulations such as the UK, Australia, and Germany. This makes MAM/PAMM business in Vanuatu potentially riskier.

---

• 
• 

---

13711580480@139.com

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

z.x.n@139.com

Mr. Z-X-N

China · Guangzhou

---